Listen baby, I'm your man and I love you. Ever since the first time we met I realized that we were meant to be together because I felt emotions around you I’ve NEVER felt around ANY woman at ANY time before. You are the first woman who made me consider how pointless my non-committal lifestyle was, but even more, you are the first woman who made me forget all my past heartbreaks and realize that I still wanted to feel what love is. You’ll never understand how hard it is for me to not feel your lips before I go to sleep and as I wake up – that kiss is the most sensual expression of my emotions but when the sex switch is flipped:
I just HAVE to beat that pussy up.
The sex switch is flipped just after we lock lips with closed eyes and we press them together softly yet firm enough to know we both meant that shit. The switch flips in both of our minds when we realize that neither of us is gonna pull away and it’s just at that moment that our brains realize we ain’t JUST kissing tonight, and our tongues instinctively find one another and we engulf each other in passion. Once that switch is flipped, my left hand is gonna go from gently cradling the back of your neck to firmly gripping the back of your head, and my right hand is gonna glide down the middle of your back and land right on your ass. You are gonna feel me gripping it hard because that’s MY way of letting you know:
Your ass is mine tonight.
Once that sex switch is flipped though, please understand you are not my beautiful, loving woman anymore – you're the sexiest person I've ever met and I’m bout to beat the brakes off that pussy. Once I flip that switch all I want to do is make you cum – all over. I want to feel your entire body shake as you scream cuss words I never even knew you knew. I want you so wet that you soak the entire bed. I want you to grit your teeth and cuss me out:
Every time you have another multiple.
I want you sweaty and horny but more than anything I flip the switch because I want you NASTY. All day we parade around under a veil of politeness and socially correct behavior. But once I'm alone with the one I love, I don’t want to be polite and nice anymore. I want to feel free - and nothing is more free than getting butt-ass-naked and FUCKING you in ways your pussy wasn’t even prepared for. I’m gonna start slow and deep, speed it up a little as I beat it up a little:
I want us to cum together – all over each other and fall down on the bed drenched in sweat.
Then I want to roll over, look you in the eyes, turn the sex switch off and lock lips softly with you again. My woman. The one I love. But the second you look up at me with even the slightest amount of lust in your eyes:
I’m turning the switch back on and I'm coming for your ass...
Champ
Cruisin' Thru Decatur
An OCD stream-of-consciousness about everything, yet absolutely nothing.
Friday, March 22, 2013
Thursday, March 14, 2013
East-Side Tales - per @MFWC1981
I want to begin by thanking Danesha (@EDIBLU for you niggas on twitta) for this opportunity. I'm too damn lazy to start my own blog so I figured I'd leech off of hers and Pooh is doing what she does right now so I've got some extra time on my hands until she gets back. Oh, I'm also too lazy to think up titles so I'm gonna use random B.o.B songs instead until I run out. I love reppin' the homies (In my Chris Rock voice).
I guess this is the part where I need to warn people that I have no filter.
SO READER(s) BEWARE!
So me and a mixed group of friends were having a discussion about cheating and reconciling, and we all came to the very obvious conclusion that men have a much harder time getting back into a relationship with a woman who has cheated on them, than women getting back with men who cheated. We floated many different theories around until my boy decided to shut the conversation down with a sentence straight from real-talk.com. He said:
“Let’s keep it real people, no dude wants to take a woman back that he THINKS was fucked by a nigga BIGGER & BETTER than him.”
He continued “The thought of some dude writing his name on parts of her pussy walls that you can’t even reach to erase is demoralizing as shit. Y’all gonna be sitting around 50 years from now in some nursing home, and she still gonna have to take pills every day it rains, because some nigga collapsed her womb decades ago...
Who wants that shit?"
We all paused to let the realness wash over us and to accept how truly pathetic yet accurate that statement was. From a man’s perspective I hate to admit that our ego’s are so entangled in something as insignificant as size and sexual performance but I realized that it’s not that far of a jump. Men WILL tie their self-worth in a relationship to how satisfied they believe their partner is in the bed, so it’s NOT a monumental stretch. But are men so insecure of said performance to let it be the determining factor in taking someone back?
Yep. We are.
Let’s be honest about something else while we are at it: A woman's disgust upon hearing her man cheated is about 40% due to the physical act, but 60% is about the distrust, disrespect and total disregard for the emotional and spiritual bond they are suppose to have as a fully committed couple. And very rarely do women think about the physical act in terms of “Damn did she deep throat him when I can only get half-way, and did she squirt for him when my 'tang is usually dryer than Tracey Morgan’s bottom lip?” She usually thinks:
"I need to get my ass to the clinic because if him and this dirty little heffa gave me something, I'ma KILL this nigga!”
But because the majority of her pain is emotional and psychological, she can find herself forgiving him through time and eventually taking him back because as her emotions swing back and forth, so does the balance of their relationship. With a man, it couldn’t be any more different because we INTERTWINE our emotions with the physical act itself. There ain’t no 40 or 60% with a man, it’s just 100:
"So this bitch just gonna let this nigga run up in her like that? FUCK HER!” *Sniffles with a quivering upper lip*
This is the same reason most men can’t handle a TRUE open relationship. We love the concept as it relates to how open WE can be, but a man’s ego will NOT allow him to handle the thought of his woman getting her walls stretched outta shape by some other dude. As insecure and ridiculous as it is, It’s understandable that a guy wouldn’t want to be looked at like the Cayman Islands Earthquake after the Haiti one.
Champ
Cruisin' Thru Decatur
I guess this is the part where I need to warn people that I have no filter.
SO READER(s) BEWARE!
So me and a mixed group of friends were having a discussion about cheating and reconciling, and we all came to the very obvious conclusion that men have a much harder time getting back into a relationship with a woman who has cheated on them, than women getting back with men who cheated. We floated many different theories around until my boy decided to shut the conversation down with a sentence straight from real-talk.com. He said:
“Let’s keep it real people, no dude wants to take a woman back that he THINKS was fucked by a nigga BIGGER & BETTER than him.”
He continued “The thought of some dude writing his name on parts of her pussy walls that you can’t even reach to erase is demoralizing as shit. Y’all gonna be sitting around 50 years from now in some nursing home, and she still gonna have to take pills every day it rains, because some nigga collapsed her womb decades ago...
Who wants that shit?"
We all paused to let the realness wash over us and to accept how truly pathetic yet accurate that statement was. From a man’s perspective I hate to admit that our ego’s are so entangled in something as insignificant as size and sexual performance but I realized that it’s not that far of a jump. Men WILL tie their self-worth in a relationship to how satisfied they believe their partner is in the bed, so it’s NOT a monumental stretch. But are men so insecure of said performance to let it be the determining factor in taking someone back?
Yep. We are.
Let’s be honest about something else while we are at it: A woman's disgust upon hearing her man cheated is about 40% due to the physical act, but 60% is about the distrust, disrespect and total disregard for the emotional and spiritual bond they are suppose to have as a fully committed couple. And very rarely do women think about the physical act in terms of “Damn did she deep throat him when I can only get half-way, and did she squirt for him when my 'tang is usually dryer than Tracey Morgan’s bottom lip?” She usually thinks:
"I need to get my ass to the clinic because if him and this dirty little heffa gave me something, I'ma KILL this nigga!”
But because the majority of her pain is emotional and psychological, she can find herself forgiving him through time and eventually taking him back because as her emotions swing back and forth, so does the balance of their relationship. With a man, it couldn’t be any more different because we INTERTWINE our emotions with the physical act itself. There ain’t no 40 or 60% with a man, it’s just 100:
"So this bitch just gonna let this nigga run up in her like that? FUCK HER!” *Sniffles with a quivering upper lip*
This is the same reason most men can’t handle a TRUE open relationship. We love the concept as it relates to how open WE can be, but a man’s ego will NOT allow him to handle the thought of his woman getting her walls stretched outta shape by some other dude. As insecure and ridiculous as it is, It’s understandable that a guy wouldn’t want to be looked at like the Cayman Islands Earthquake after the Haiti one.
Champ
Cruisin' Thru Decatur
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Every Good Man
I have several friends that come to me for relationship/end-of-relationship advice. Haven't quite figured out why, yet.
Somehow they all find me for end-of-relationship advice right around their depression stage of grief. In an effort to provide quality advice, I try to assess my friend's situation as well as his/her mindset...
These are my stories. *insert Law & Order sound clip here*
So many times, it seemed the reason the woman had trouble moving forward after a breakup (pending she is the breakup-ee) is because she saw the "potential" this man had or because this man was simply
These are my stories. *insert Law & Order sound clip here*
So many times, it seemed the reason the woman had trouble moving forward after a breakup (pending she is the breakup-ee) is because she saw the "potential" this man had or because this man was simply
...a good man.
Welp ladies,
every good man is not for every good woman
and vice versa. It's an obvious and OVERLOOKED fact of life.
WHAT IN THE GOOD FUCK CONSTITUTES A "GOOD MAN/WOMAN" ANYWAY????
serious question. answer it.
project: ask a few female and male friends to list what makes a person look good on paper. even better, ask them to prioritize the list and then look at the drastic differences between sexes
People say "good man/woman" as if these terms have universal definitions.
They don't. It's based on your personal beliefs.
Even if this person you seek as a potential mate fits all of your criteria, there's the realistic chance of this person not fitting in your life.
Examples
You're celibate. Is he still considered a good man once you realize he's trying to wine & dine them draws off? (I mean seriously...what man doesn't have that as his ultimate goal?)
Aside: I've never been the type to say "niggas* ain't shit." But I'll tell anyone that most niggas' intentions aren't shit. In the nigga's defense, he typically only gets away with whatever you allow him to.
*In this text, nigga is being used as a term for men in general...not all, just most.
*In this text, nigga is being used as a term for men in general...not all, just most.
You've experienced being cheated on before. Is he still considered a good man if he says he considers infidelity "the norm?"
You yearn for emotional connectedness (i.g. you're needy as hell). Is he still considered a good man if he's apathetic or is non-responsive towards your emotional needs?
The answer is SURE! He can still be a good dude. Just not the good guy for you.
Look at your resume of a good mate. If you're considered "good" by your own standards, then why waste time seeking the attention of one?
Don't get me wrong. I understand emotional attachments can be strong n shit. And I know what it's like to feel like options are limited as an educated, black woman. But it's just not worth it to pursue a man that doesn't complement you.
Men:
Everything stated above was as pertinent to you as it was to the women. However, I have two issues in particular with men:
Hubris
I have no idea WHY some negroes feel that they are the BEST MAN the woman they just broke up with ever had, will ever have, or can dream up.
Naw, cuh.
To pride yourself on being a good man is GREAT! - but there is a fine line between confidence and arrogance. Sit yo'ass down thinking that you are the only man with your "credentials."
If you look at my resume, I am THE SHIT
The Blame Game
Other negroes will apply sole blame to the female for the relationship's demise. It humors me when my male friends say, "Her (insert character flaw here) is why she can't keep a man," about their exes. Umm....but you're single, too, homie.
Apparently, you can't keep a woman.
I honestly think some of you believe you're LESS single than your ex.
Yall in the same damn boat...
...or am I missing sumn?
Final thoughts: Don't waste energy on a "good" ex...especially if they aren't wasting theirs on you.
Be blessed!
Friday, January 25, 2013
Baby Pre-Req: Marriage or Money?
Question
What's really more important before deciding to bring a child into the world - being married or financially stable???
Think on it before you proceed.
Still thinking?
Now, why did you choose that answer over the other?
Done yet?
Okay.....my turn.
I want to yell "FINANCIALLY STABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" from the mountain tops, buuuuuttt.....I have reasons to think marriage would be more important as well.
Honestly....I must have some Gemini in me the way I split views on everything. CANCER FOR LIFE!!!!!! 69
MARRIAGE
I certainly see myself being married before I have a child. I consider myself Christian, so per my beliefs I should be married before procreating the good old fashioned way. However, if I lived as I should per my beliefs, I'd be a completely different person. I try to walk the straight and narrow, but it's more like I'm walking on a turnpike. Anyway, enough of my spiritual struggles. I could write a book on those.
I was raised in a two-parent home with loving, married parents (loving towards us anyway....as far as each other...it just depended on the day. Haha) It's a beautiful thing to have love coming from both parents. They weren't balling at all, but my sisters and I still had all of the essentials and a little more. However, it came at a price. All of us - parents and children - had to sacrifice different things occasionally because it was best for the whole.
Not knocking having to sacrifice at all.... Lessons were learned. Humility was taught. I turned out awesome.
I'd just rather not go through those times from the mirrored side if I don't have to. #AndThenIKanyeShrug
MONEY
All the love in the world ain't buying diapers, formula, clothes, food, rent, etc... Romanticizing that "Just-the-two-of-us" feeling into thinking that we can get through anything is sweet n'shyt, but uh...I'd rather get through without the financial problems, at least.
Gotta backtrack for a second: I'm not saying I need to be RICH before having a child. I said FINANCIALLY STABLE. And what's financially stable to one person may be questionable to the next. It's SUBJECTIVE. My loose definition of financially stable would be to have at least a 3-month rainy day fund built up, a comfortable amount in savings, and a secure job/career that is constantly feeding my checking account before I bring a life into this world. (Not to mention having a house that I'm making steady payments on along with a dependable vehicle.) And yes...I know nothing is guaranteed to be a particular way forever. Anything could occur and wipe out all of my savings....but at least I tried!
THE BS HAPPY MEDIUM I COME UP WITH AT THE END TO LET YOU KNOW YOUR OPPOSING VIEW DOESN'T COMPLETELY SUCK
I think the key words in the question are "deciding" and "stable."
What's really more important before deciding to bring a child into the world - being married or financially stable???
Think on it before you proceed.
Still thinking?
Now, why did you choose that answer over the other?
Done yet?
Okay.....my turn.
I want to yell "FINANCIALLY STABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" from the mountain tops, buuuuuttt.....I have reasons to think marriage would be more important as well.
MARRIAGE
I certainly see myself being married before I have a child. I consider myself Christian, so per my beliefs I should be married before procreating the good old fashioned way. However, if I lived as I should per my beliefs, I'd be a completely different person. I try to walk the straight and narrow, but it's more like I'm walking on a turnpike. Anyway, enough of my spiritual struggles. I could write a book on those.
I was raised in a two-parent home with loving, married parents (loving towards us anyway....as far as each other...it just depended on the day. Haha) It's a beautiful thing to have love coming from both parents. They weren't balling at all, but my sisters and I still had all of the essentials and a little more. However, it came at a price. All of us - parents and children - had to sacrifice different things occasionally because it was best for the whole.
Not knocking having to sacrifice at all.... Lessons were learned. Humility was taught. I turned out awesome.
I'd just rather not go through those times from the mirrored side if I don't have to. #AndThenIKanyeShrug
MONEY
All the love in the world ain't buying diapers, formula, clothes, food, rent, etc... Romanticizing that "Just-the-two-of-us" feeling into thinking that we can get through anything is sweet n'shyt, but uh...I'd rather get through without the financial problems, at least.
Gotta backtrack for a second: I'm not saying I need to be RICH before having a child. I said FINANCIALLY STABLE. And what's financially stable to one person may be questionable to the next. It's SUBJECTIVE. My loose definition of financially stable would be to have at least a 3-month rainy day fund built up, a comfortable amount in savings, and a secure job/career that is constantly feeding my checking account before I bring a life into this world. (Not to mention having a house that I'm making steady payments on along with a dependable vehicle.) And yes...I know nothing is guaranteed to be a particular way forever. Anything could occur and wipe out all of my savings....but at least I tried!
THE BS HAPPY MEDIUM I COME UP WITH AT THE END TO LET YOU KNOW YOUR OPPOSING VIEW DOESN'T COMPLETELY SUCK
I think the key words in the question are "deciding" and "stable."
- In this day and age, half (or more) pregnancies are unplanned. It's gotta be difficult to say what's more important once you see that plus sign on the stick.
- Stability is based on personal beliefs. Some people find stability in marriage. Others find stability in money. As long as you're stable somewhere is what's really important, I suppose.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Estrogen, Insecurity, and Facebook
Estrogen: Women are innate investigators. We seek. We analyze. We find. Not sure of the statistics of men vs women investigators/detectives, but I'd put money on women being pretty damn good at closing cases.
Insecurity: Uncontrolled by a single hormone, both males and females are subjected to being insecure...overwhelmed by it, consumed even.
And what better to enable an insecure, investigative woman than Facebook.
Times have changed. Intuitions of infidelity are no longer left to the imagination. Thanks to technology, those intuitions are manifested into reality (or a pseudo-reality) via text messages, wall posts, subtweets, and the like.
We live in a time where it isn't enough to profess your like/love to the person you're with. Now days - for many females - a relationship isn't "official" until it's on Facebook.
How fucking absurd.
....and yet, I vaguely understand the logic.
Dear Insecure-ass Woman:
If a man is going to cheat, he's going to cheat regardless of a social-network status. Women, too, for that matter. Even if this man broadcasts your relationship status to the world and collates pictures of you and him together from Day 1 of the relationship to the present and puts it in a public album, guess what...that makes him no less likely to step-out on you, boo.
Some guys will go to the extent of making the relationship status only visible to you and your friends. (That's what I call dedication, albeit a waste of valuable time.) Soooo....you're in your world of bliss because all 98 of the "Me & My Bae" pictures you've tagged him in are there for the world to see when in reality...can't nobody see that shit but you.
Tagging this man in all of your excessive amounts pictures/posts/etc is the equivalent to a dog marking his territory. In the words of @The_Madd_1, "If she gone do all that, she might as well just piss on me." Good point.
And hey....maybe this guy just isn't the same social-network butterfly you are. Let him live. If he's treating you right and doing the things to make you happy (with the exception of the Facebook thing), then BE HAPPY!!! I think that's a ridiculously simple compromise.
Why it makes (some) sense:
If this guy is social-network savvy, posts statuses n such on a regular basis, and is reluctant to accept a simple "In a relationship" status change on something he's on everyday then yeah... It would piss me off, too, I suppose.
I think it's especially funny when men claim to be so nonchalant about what goes on Facebook/Twitter, but will delete a post in a heartbeat.
IF YOU DON'T CARE, THEN WHY THE FUCK DO YOU HAVE TO DELETE POSTS? (That was for you. Yes.....you, sir.)
True enough, a lot of women are insecure; but, somethings are just intuitive. In my opinion, deleting posts is like deleting evidence. But hey...that's just me. And that's also a whole different discussion.
But back to the point at hand:
If your man isn't cheating on you...your insecurity is probably going to drive him to do so...or leave.
Be blessed!
Insecurity: Uncontrolled by a single hormone, both males and females are subjected to being insecure...overwhelmed by it, consumed even.
And what better to enable an insecure, investigative woman than Facebook.
Times have changed. Intuitions of infidelity are no longer left to the imagination. Thanks to technology, those intuitions are manifested into reality (or a pseudo-reality) via text messages, wall posts, subtweets, and the like.
We live in a time where it isn't enough to profess your like/love to the person you're with. Now days - for many females - a relationship isn't "official" until it's on Facebook.
How fucking absurd.
....and yet, I vaguely understand the logic.
(If created into a mathematical proof, this would make me vaguely fucking absurd, right?)
Dear Insecure-ass Woman:
If a man is going to cheat, he's going to cheat regardless of a social-network status. Women, too, for that matter. Even if this man broadcasts your relationship status to the world and collates pictures of you and him together from Day 1 of the relationship to the present and puts it in a public album, guess what...that makes him no less likely to step-out on you, boo.
Some guys will go to the extent of making the relationship status only visible to you and your friends. (That's what I call dedication, albeit a waste of valuable time.) Soooo....you're in your world of bliss because all 98 of the "Me & My Bae" pictures you've tagged him in are there for the world to see when in reality...can't nobody see that shit but you.
Tagging this man in all of your excessive amounts pictures/posts/etc is the equivalent to a dog marking his territory. In the words of @The_Madd_1, "If she gone do all that, she might as well just piss on me." Good point.
And hey....maybe this guy just isn't the same social-network butterfly you are. Let him live. If he's treating you right and doing the things to make you happy (with the exception of the Facebook thing), then BE HAPPY!!! I think that's a ridiculously simple compromise.
Why it makes (some) sense:
If this guy is social-network savvy, posts statuses n such on a regular basis, and is reluctant to accept a simple "In a relationship" status change on something he's on everyday then yeah... It would piss me off, too, I suppose.
I think it's especially funny when men claim to be so nonchalant about what goes on Facebook/Twitter, but will delete a post in a heartbeat.
IF YOU DON'T CARE, THEN WHY THE FUCK DO YOU HAVE TO DELETE POSTS? (That was for you. Yes.....you, sir.)
True enough, a lot of women are insecure; but, somethings are just intuitive. In my opinion, deleting posts is like deleting evidence. But hey...that's just me. And that's also a whole different discussion.
But back to the point at hand:
If your man isn't cheating on you...your insecurity is probably going to drive him to do so...or leave.
Be blessed!
Thursday, August 2, 2012
I Don't Need A Man
I fucking hate when a woman says "I don't need a man."
My follow-up response is always two questions:
1. Do you ever want to get married?
2a. If she doesn't have kids: Do you ever want to have children?
or
2b. If she has kids: Do you want someone to be a father to your child(ren)?
A "yes" response to either of these questions means that YOU NEED A MAN (Lesbians can make it with a no on the first one, but still need a man for number two.)
Smart-ass females like to say something about how they can be artificially inseminated. Unless evolution has stepped its game up without my knowledge and females have started asexually reproducing, then YOU STILL NEED A MAN to be inSEMENated (and yea, I know how it's spelled). Right?
Then there are the females that emphatically answer no to both questions. To the ones that say they can marry themselves, I affectionately say "Bitch, bye." By all means, have fun with your miserable ass life. I couldn't imagine being an unmarried 60 year-old woman with no kids, sitting at home, living vicariously through Lynn while watching old episodes of Girlfriends.
There isn't enough botox in the world to lift up a spirit that lonely.
*sigh*
It's one thing to "not need a man" to take care of materialistic things for you. To say you don't need one altogether, however, is a lie.
And let's be honest, just because you don't "need" one does NOT mean you don't WANT one.
Keep it 100.
My follow-up response is always two questions:
1. Do you ever want to get married?
2a. If she doesn't have kids: Do you ever want to have children?
or
2b. If she has kids: Do you want someone to be a father to your child(ren)?
A "yes" response to either of these questions means that YOU NEED A MAN (Lesbians can make it with a no on the first one, but still need a man for number two.)
Smart-ass females like to say something about how they can be artificially inseminated. Unless evolution has stepped its game up without my knowledge and females have started asexually reproducing, then YOU STILL NEED A MAN to be inSEMENated (and yea, I know how it's spelled). Right?
Then there are the females that emphatically answer no to both questions. To the ones that say they can marry themselves, I affectionately say "Bitch, bye." By all means, have fun with your miserable ass life. I couldn't imagine being an unmarried 60 year-old woman with no kids, sitting at home, living vicariously through Lynn while watching old episodes of Girlfriends.
There isn't enough botox in the world to lift up a spirit that lonely.
*sigh*
It's one thing to "not need a man" to take care of materialistic things for you. To say you don't need one altogether, however, is a lie.
And let's be honest, just because you don't "need" one does NOT mean you don't WANT one.
Keep it 100.
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Hoes Love Jesus, Too
Ask a woman about the things she looks for in her potential mate. Most women have this exhaustive (unrealistic) check-list of positive traits that no one man could ever hit "Select All" on. The list usually go something like:
And if she's a Christian woman (or any woman of faith, for that matter), throw something in there about him being of the same faith with some arbitrary level of spirituality. Christian women tend to base a man's level of spiritually off how often he goes to church. If he goes every Sunday then voilà ---> Mr. Got Damn Right!
Unfortuantely ladies (and gents).......HOES LOVE JESUS, TOO.
I've debated for the longest how to get this point across...
Defining "hoe"
To adequately define that would take another blog and a significant amount of time. After several conversations with make-shift focus groups, the point is clear: "hoe" is a HIGHLY subjective term.
The best I've been able to forge thus far is:
It may also be used as an adjective or an adverb, but....that's for another time.
Hoes love God, and God loves hoes
Throughout the Bible, there were prostitutes (Biblical hoes). Some of them were winning.
Hosea 1:2: When the Lord began to speak through Hosea, the Lord said to him, “Go, marry a promiscuous woman and have children with her..."
Judeges 11:1: Jephthah the Gileadite was a mighty warrior. His father was Gilead; his mother was a prostitute.
1 Kings 14:24: There were even male shrine prostitutes in the land...
Joshua 2:1: Then Joshua son of Nun secretly sent two spies from Shittim. “Go, look over the land,” he said, “especially Jericho. ” So they went and entered the house of a prostitute named Rahab and stayed there. Then in Joshua 2:14 they told her: "If you don’t tell what we are doing, we will treat you kindly and faithfully when the Lord gives us the land.”
Then of course, there's Mary Magdalene. But nothing in the Bible ever said she was a prostitute. Just that 7 demons were eradicated from her. Be it as it may, Mary loved Jesus and Jesus loved her back.
Anyway, the Whole Point of this Blog:
The amount of time a person spends in church is not directly proportional to
...however, it saddens me when women get their hopes up over a man just because he goes to church every Sunday. There's that slight possibility that he's there every Sunday because he's praying that he didn't become a daddy Saturday night. (BTW, I have no clue if men have this notion that women that go to church every Sunday are better than those that do not. Feel free to fill me in.)
Be blessed!
Attractive
Honest
Intelligent
Faithful
Conversationalist
Romantic
Likes to cuddle
Blah
Blah
Blah
Blah
Blah
Unfortuantely ladies (and gents).......HOES LOVE JESUS, TOO.
I've debated for the longest how to get this point across...
Defining "hoe"
To adequately define that would take another blog and a significant amount of time. After several conversations with make-shift focus groups, the point is clear: "hoe" is a HIGHLY subjective term.
Asking random people to define hoe is actually an EXCELLENT conversation starter. Try it one day.
The best I've been able to forge thus far is:
hoe \ hō \ (noun): a male or female with some societally unacceptable level of promiscuity
I also like how @BluuDemize put it. Something to the effect of
"Women can't define hoe. They just know they ain't one."
....although HE never gave a definition either. Side eye.
It may also be used as an adjective or an adverb, but....that's for another time.
Hoes love God, and God loves hoes
Throughout the Bible, there were prostitutes (Biblical hoes). Some of them were winning.
Hosea 1:2: When the Lord began to speak through Hosea, the Lord said to him, “Go, marry a promiscuous woman and have children with her..."
Judeges 11:1: Jephthah the Gileadite was a mighty warrior. His father was Gilead; his mother was a prostitute.
1 Kings 14:24: There were even male shrine prostitutes in the land...
Joshua 2:1: Then Joshua son of Nun secretly sent two spies from Shittim. “Go, look over the land,” he said, “especially Jericho. ” So they went and entered the house of a prostitute named Rahab and stayed there. Then in Joshua 2:14 they told her: "If you don’t tell what we are doing, we will treat you kindly and faithfully when the Lord gives us the land.”
More prostitutes in the Bible: http://noreligionblog.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/top-thirteen-prostitutes-of-the-bible/ It's amazing how much one can learn from atheists about the Bible. I dig it.
Then of course, there's Mary Magdalene. But nothing in the Bible ever said she was a prostitute. Just that 7 demons were eradicated from her. Be it as it may, Mary loved Jesus and Jesus loved her back.
Anyway, the Whole Point of this Blog:
The amount of time a person spends in church is not directly proportional to
- how close his or her walk is with God,
- the likelihood he or she will not cheat on you, nor
- how good he or she will treat you.
...however, it saddens me when women get their hopes up over a man just because he goes to church every Sunday. There's that slight possibility that he's there every Sunday because he's praying that he didn't become a daddy Saturday night. (BTW, I have no clue if men have this notion that women that go to church every Sunday are better than those that do not. Feel free to fill me in.)
Be blessed!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)